President Barack Obama Should Show Strong Spine and Over Rule The Military over Iraq and Afghanistan

Analysis: Even military split over Iraq pullout
Buzz Up Send
Email IM Share
Delicious Digg Facebook Fark Newsvine Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Bookmarks Print By ROBERT BURNS, Associated Press Writer Robert Burns, Associated Press Writer – 30 mins ago
Featured Topics: Barack Obama Presidential Transition AP – In this Sunday, Feb. 15, 2009 picture, U.S. soldiers stand guard after a road side bomb blast in the …
Play Video Barack Obama Video:Durham mayor meets with Obama WRAL Raleigh Play Video Barack Obama Video:Lahood mulls mileage tax, Obama says no AP Play Video Barack Obama Video:Perdue to meet with Obama on stimulus package WRAL Raleigh WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama faces split opinions within the military on whether to make the speedy withdrawal from Iraq he championed on the campaign trail.

Obama's top generals in Baghdad are pressing for an elongated timetable, while some influential senior advisers inside the Pentagon are more amenable to a quicker pullout.

Although Obama has yet to decide the matter, his announcement last week that he's sending thousands more combat troops to Afghanistan implies a drawdown of at least two brigades from Iraq by summer.

But that does not answer the question that has been dangling over Iraq since he took office in January: Will Obama stick to his stated goal of a 16-month pullout or opt for a slower, less risky approach?

Gen. Ray Odierno, the top American commander in Baghdad, favors a longer timetable for leaving Iraq. He sees 2009 as a pivotal year, with parliamentary elections set to be held in December; he doesn't want to lose more than two of the 14 combat brigades that are now in Iraq before the end of the year. And he believes the U.S. military will need to remain engaged in Iraq, to some degree, for years to come.

Odierno's boss at U.S. Central Command, Gen. David Petraeus, leans toward Odierno's view.

Gen. David McKiernan, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has steered clear of the debate over withdrawing from Iraq, but he sees his battlefield as an increasingly urgent priority — not just for additional combat troops but also for Iraq-focused surveillance aircraft and more civilian support.

There are now about 146,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, compared with 38,000 in Afghanistan. Obama has directed 17,000 more to head to Afghanistan, including Marines and soldiers who had been in line for Iraq duty.

At the Pentagon, a more mixed view prevails. The uniformed service chiefs see Iraq as a strain on their troops and, more broadly, a drain on their resources. The Marines, in particular, are in the tough position of having a foothold in both major U.S. wars — Iraq and Afghanistan. As a relatively small service, they would prefer to concentrate more fully on Afghanistan, if only they could get out of Iraq.

Neither Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, nor Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said publicly whether he supports a 16-month withdrawal timeline. But they have their own perspective — an obligation to consider the full spectrum of threats and potential threats to U.S. national security.

"There's a very clear understanding of what is at stake here," Mullen said Feb. 10. "And it's very natural for Gen. Odierno to want to go slower and to hang onto capability as long as possible," he added. "That's not unusual. It's very natural for Gen. McKiernan to say, 'I need more.' And so that's the tension. We don't have an infinite pot (of resources and deployable forces). We have to make hard decisions about where to accept risk."

In internal discussions, the emphasis appears to be on getting out responsibly rather than quickly, several officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because no decisions have been made.

Obama must weigh an array of hard-to-figure tradeoffs in security and politics. And he must reconcile his conviction that the combat phase of U.S. involvement in Iraq must end with his commanders' concern in Baghdad that hard-fought gains could be squandered.

It boils down to this: How much more effort is the Iraq war worth? What is the risk of leaving too soon?

Is the 16-month timetable too short, given the uncertain state of stability and political reconciliation in Iraq and the potential cost of seeing the country slide back into widespread sectarian war?

And is anything substantially beyond 16 months too long, given the call for still more troops in Afghanistan, where Obama himself has said the battle against extremists is going in the wrong direction?

Obama is still considering his options, which officials say includes a less hurried, 23-month withdrawal. The deadline he inherited from the Bush administration is Dec. 31, 2011, the date set in a security agreement with Baghdad that says all U.S. troops, not just combat forces, must be gone by then.

One clue to some of the thinking inside the White House might lie with the views of Obama's national security adviser, retired Marine Gen. James Jones. Jones co-chaired a study published in January 2008 on the way ahead in Afghanistan. The group endorsed the idea of providing more military support for Afghanistan, including resources that become available as combat forces are withdrawn from Iraq.

The president has an additional factor to weigh: the political cost of backing off the 16-month pullout timetable that was a prominent feature of his campaign. Although he has said he thinks 16 months is a reasonable timetable, he also has assured military leaders that he will consider their advice.

Notably absent, at least so far, is even a whiff of public pressure from fellow Democrats to stick to a 16-month timeline. That suggests Obama's party might be satisfied so long as he makes early and clear steps in the direction of ending U.S. combat involvement in Iraq, even if on a somewhat longer timeline.

Obama campaigned for the White House on a promise that he would end the war and get U.S. commanders moving immediately on a transition to Iraqi control of their own security. He said military experts believe combat troops can be pulled out safely at a rate of one to two brigades a month, meaning all 14 combat brigades there now could be gone within 16 months, which equates to mid-2010.

Peter Mansoor, a retired Army colonel who was the executive officer for Petraeus when the general was in Baghdad overseeing the "surge" of U.S. forces in 2007-08, said he thinks it likely that Obama will pull at least four combat brigades out of Iraq by the end of this year. But he hopes the president does not insist on getting all 14 brigades out within 16 months.

"If the president orders it, the military can do it, but whether it's advisable or not is a different story," he said in a telephone interview. "Quite frankly, I don't think it is, given the risk you would incur to potentially upsetting the political situation" inside Iraq.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090221/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/iraq_us_pullout_analysis

Any Military Solution in Afghanistan Will Be Foolish Only Diplomatic Solution is the Way

The approach in Afghanistan should be through negotian with all the political forces in the country including the Taliban. The idea of demonizing what thought to be an enemy is load to failure or some much expense and depeltion of resources. No more troops are needed. No more troops to be sent . Only toughr negotiaions with financial aid for development.

The Republican Proposition for Tax Cut Stimulus Package is Pure Nonsense

The tax cut advocated by the Republican mavericks is pure nonsense. The premise that individuals that the individuals have the ultimate wisdom while the government is bum. The Barack Obama the money in the right place and nothing like a random jungle of the republicans.

Barack Obama Job Sector Targeted Stimulus Package Will Bring Better Results

Barack Obama stimulus package will bring better results. It is more intelligent and will be more effective than the pure simplistic tax cuts of George W Bush.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/congress_stimulus

The Republicans in Senate Putting Barack Obama For a Test to See if He Rolls Over?

President Barack Obama faces his first political test. The Republicans in the senate are checking him out and examining his backbone. The Stimulus package that is under current consideration and revue in the senate is the very test he is subjected to. The Republicans want to see if he bends over, buckle and waffle? If he does that then they won and have the green light to obstruct him and toy him for the next four years of his presidency.

The American Age of Pure Capitalism is Over

The American age of pure capitalism is over and now many socialist programs are accepted.

Barack Obama Has All the Criteria to Be Great President However He Has a Problem With Appointments

President Barack Obama and his selection team should be very careful next time for selecting different candidates to occupy important government positions.

President Barack Obama Should in Earnest Start Pulling Some Troops Out of Iraq to Prove His Credibility

President Barack Obama made one of his potent points during his campaign that he intends to pull the troops out of Iraq according to some plan. Although he did not specify all the details but now some of the ones who voted for him expect that he should start pulling some troops without much delay.
So President Barack Obama should do just that and start pulling some troops out of Iraq. Any delay will cause that his high approval rating will start to decline and dip. He should not risk that and he can not afford it. Once the decline of his approval rating drops he will no able to reverse it.